ooh la la, lindsey

This Week In Chachbaggery: It’s Just A Harmless Engrish Joke Edition

February 9, 2010 · 2 Comments

I follow Scott Baio on Twitter, so you don’t have to.

Le sigh. Not much to report on the Baio front, folks. You haters have apparently muzzled poor Scott Baio. If he can’t make fun of scary black people Michelle Obama, who can he make fun of?

ASIANS! That’s who Scott Baio can make fun of! Asians, with their charming inability to speak the English language as God, George Washington and Chachi intended!

There’s a strain of sadness to the comedy stylings of Scott Baio’s TwitPics lately. What can you laugh at in this sick, sad world if you can’t laugh at people who are different from you?

Ah, for those bygone wistful days, when women were women and (white) men could tell humdingers about those silly Asians. Or Arabs. It’s a sentiment shared by one of Scott Baio’s loyal fans:

(At Asians.)

As always, remember to follow Scott Baio on Twitter and enjoy his special brand of kah-razy every day. Tell your friends!

→ 2 CommentsCategories: America · Chachbaggery · Social Media
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

February 9, 2010 · 1 Comment

Tim Tebow post.

1) Tim Tebow was prayed for, a “chosen one”. EW. I have been hearing the same thing for four fucking years, but re: football. The willingness of media (and his parents) to canonize this kid is disturbing.

2) “Toughness”. Women who abort aren’t “tough”; Pam Tebow and Sarah Palin, who “chose” to carry their pregnancies to term (even though Pam’s story seems to be that of a woman who desperately WANTED a child, any child, and actively pursued that goal), are “tough”. Women are “strong enough” to choose life. Well, fuck you both. Even Superwoman is not tough enough to withstand all that our society throws at mothers, especially non-white, non-middle and upper class, non-married mothers.

3) http://www.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/tebow-ad-all-smiles-cruelty This piece examines the “toughness” meme.

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

In Which The Orlando Sentinel Succeeds In Finally Taking My One Joy Away From Me

February 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Dear Orlando Sentinel,

Look, I know I’ve written bad things about you. And you deserved it every time. But really, it’s not (completely) your fault: things just haven’t been the same since you were bought by the guy who thinks people want puppies, not news. It’s time for me to admit that I’ve stopped reading you. You see, my dermatologist told me that I needed to cut out as many sources of stress in my life as possible. Between your shoddily designed front page (seriously, look at it) and your poorly managed editorial section, you were a major source of agita for me. Now, I’m a news nerd; there is nothing I enjoy more than curling up with my cheetah print Snuggie, a cup of coffee and the paper in the morning. But it was becoming ridiculous to spend an hour of my life reading your paper, then spending another hour on the Internet reading the real news of the day.

BUT! I also love sports! And being from a mid-major, non-BCS university located in Orlando, I have no other option but the Orlando Sentinel if I want coverage of my teams. And your sports section is usually pretty good. In fact, your sports section is the only redeemable thing about your publication anymore. When I sit down every morning with my cheetah print Snuggie, a cup of coffee and just your sports section, my day no longer begin with anger and yelling.

As a sports fan, this is my national holiday. I wake up on Super Bowl Sunday like a five year old wakes up on Christmas morning. In a family of atheist sports fanatics like mine, this is truly the most holy day of the year. And what better way to begin Super Bowl Sunday than spending an hour with the sports section? In honor of the Saints, I made a cup of cafe au lait and got down to the serious business of the day: a page-long comparison of Breesus and Peyton Manning.

And then the anger and the yelling began.

You, Orlando Sentinel, in your infinite wisdom, decided to run a half-page fundamentalist raving section opinion section on everyone’s favorite anti-choicer and his mommykins. Because if there’s any place for a rational, fact-based discussion of a medical procedure, it’s the sports page. And you know, there were some guys who wrote in articulating a pro-choice viewpoint, which is great! I love them! I would date them! But that’s one of the things that made me so angry (besides, you know, POLITICS. IN THE SPORTS PAGE. ON SUPER BOWL SUNDAY.): every opinion was from a guy. Every. Single. One. And they were in response to a anti-Tebow commercial editorial by a male columnist. None of these people, it should go without saying, will ever need to have an abortion. So what you gave me this beautiful Sunday morning is a salon of men, responding to another man, who in turn was opining on ANOTHER man, about what women should or should not be allowed to do with their bodies.

This is my life, Orlando Sentinel, and the life of every other woman in this country. Every day, we get to experience very opinionated dudes telling us ladies what’s good for us. The one place where I don’t get that is was the sports section. So thank you, Orlando Sentinel, for politicizing the last non-politicized section of your paper I had.

Sincerely, Disappointed

→ Leave a CommentCategories: America · Florida · Journalism · Media · Politics · Society
Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

This Week In Chachbaggery: Clarifying and Retweeting

January 26, 2010 · 2 Comments

I follow Scott Baio on Twitter, so you don’t have to.

Scott Baio is still really pissed about all of you LOSERS trying to take away his inherent right to call Michelle Obama ugly freedom of speech! And he has some things he’d like to clarify. Specifically, some things he’d like to clarify by retweeting his fans.



Scott Baio isn’t the douchebag here; society (a.k.a. YOU GUYS) is. And the LIBERAL MEDIA is always calling Michelle Obama ugly and scary. It happens every day, people. Also? His super funny picture and not at all offensive TwitPic of Michelle Obama (so super funny and not at all offensive that Baio has deleted it) was just “marital humor”:



By the “way”, if you criticize “Scott” Baio, “you” are a loser “with” no “life”:


I will do this when La Lohan and R.Patz take to Twitter to laugh at teh LGBTz.
Would you like more proof that Scott Baio isn’t racist, because he deleted the pictures he took with an actual black person from TwitPic? Scott Baio will give you proof!

You see, Scott Baio cannot possibly be racist because last year the New York Post was 1000% MORE RACIST than Scott Baio ever was. Except Scott Baio was never racist. To recap: the New York Post is a bazillion times more not-racist than Scott Baio.
Hey, remember last week, when Scott Baio said this:

Well…

…why aren’t you laughing, Scott Baio? Jennifer Lopez is just joking, GOD WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO DESTROY HER FREEDOM OF SPEECH ALL THE TIME IT’S JUST A JOKE.

There is nothing funny about football, Scott Baio. It’s serious business for some of us.

This is the standard teabagger line, y’all.


I am not ashamed to tell you guys that I have absolutely no idea what this exchange means. Are there are conservatives BUT NOT REPUBLICANS who can translate?

Yes, Scott Baio, that is generally what it means when someone’s team wins the AFC Championship.

And finally, the tweet that killed my soul:

How could you do this, Cy Tolliver?

As always, remember to follow Scott Baio on Twitter and enjoy his special brand of kah-razy every day.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Chachbaggery · Social Media
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

How To Be THAT GUY On Facebook

January 22, 2010 · 1 Comment

I have a friend on Facebook that is your average, run of the mill neocon. I liken him to the governor we share, the ever-orange Charlie Crist (who, in fact, said Facebook friend really likes): he has some bizarre ideas–such as, everything can be solved by cutting taxes–but, all things considered, he’s inoffensive and harmless.

But my friend has other friends. And they’re douchebags!

Observe: my Facebook friend often posts links to news stories to his 3,000 friends (or–come on–”friends”), usually without comment, and asks his friends what they think about it. A few days ago, he posted a link to this article from Advertising Age, about Royal Caribbean continuing to dock in Haiti even with the, you know, destruction and dying and dead bodies being dumped into mass graves mere miles from Royal Caribbean’s private beach. (My Facebook friend is in PR. This is, obviously, terrible, no good, very bad PR.)

Most people commented back with variations on this theme: “Oh, wow. That’s terrible. How can you frolic on a beach when there is a humanitarian crisis so close? Bad taste!” But then there was this guy:

Yes, it’s true. Only a libtard DEMOCRAT would have a hard time enjoying his daiquiri while the country surrounding them has literally been reduced to rubble and the death toll continues to skyrocket. You, Andrew Diakos, win the day. You are officially that guy. Perhaps you would like to meet this man?

→ 1 CommentCategories: America · La Vie Lindsey · Social Media · Society · Stupid Things
Tagged: , , , , ,

This Week In Chachbaggery: No, Seriously, Scott Baio Is Really This Much Of An Idiot Edition

January 21, 2010 · 9 Comments

I follow Scott Baio on Twitter, so you don’t have to.

Wow. What a whirlwind these past few days have been for those of us who follow the tweetings of Scott Baio. Racism! Death Threats! TwitPics! If there’s anything we learned from this experience, it is that Scott Baio is not a lovable, bumbling celebrity who doesn’t understand teh internetz. Scott Baio is actually just this much of a douchebag.

It began innocently enough. Scott Baio posted this TwitPic, with the following comment:

It’s funny, because it’s an unflattering (possibly photoshopped?) picture of Michelle Obama! And Scott Baio doesn’t think Michelle Obama is pretty! And she’s a black lady, and she’s angry! Har har har! (Also? Not to body-snark, but Scott Baio’s wife wakes up to this every morning. Glass houses, Baio.)

But then you people started being SO. MEAN. to Scott Baio. And all because he posted one unflattering picture of an angry black lady, to laugh at! And you hypocrites would SO be laughing if Scott Baio had posted a mean picture of Sarah Palin, which Scott Baio would never do, but he knows you would react differently! GOD WHY CAN’T YOU PEOPLE JUST TAKE A BAD PICTURE OF A MEAN BLACK LADY AND LAUGH AT IT LIKE SCOTT BAIO WANTS YOU TO?!?

How dare you say that you won’t give money to Scott Baio’s charity just because you’ve realized that he’s a douche? Why do you hate the children?

Scott Baio’s definition of “bury you” is “defend Michelle Obama’s honor”, “publicly question Scott Baio’s judgement”, “remark that Scott Baio seems kind of racist, sort of” or respond to his tweets with anything other than “lol, i heart scott, ur a reel merikin!1!”

Yes, Scott Baio, I know! For example, the reason that I got blocked by Scott Baio was for this. I was just trying to help you get more followers when you were new to Twitter, Scott Baio. God. So ungrateful.

And then things got interesting.

To be honest? I don’t really care about this. I mean, you shouldn’t threaten to kill people, period. I’m not bothering to screencap dumb Scott Baio’s exchanges with equally dumb people who allegedly threatened his life. If you really care, you can read about it here. Now, let’s go back to laughing at Scott Baio.

Hmm. Looks like someone just luuuuuurves the government now.

Scott Baio cannot possibly be a racist, y’all. He let’s his wife hang out with a black person, after all! And there’s photographic evidence!

It is a known FACT that no racist is allowed to appear in pictures with black people, ever. And he’s even smiling! See? Racism, disproven. (You might wonder what this “race card” that Scott Baio keeps referring to is. Living in Florida, I speak fluent moron, so allow me to translate: the “race card” is “played” when someone points out that something might be offensive to a minority, or when something is blatantly offensive to any thinking person. When a person points out that a joke, phrase, picture, etc. is offensive, they are “playing the race card” and are therefore even more terrible than the alleged racist, times a bazillion.)

Well, I’m convinced. Scott Baio not only directed shows featuring black people, he actually worked alongside black people for an extended period of time. Such a person couldn’t possibly say or do racist things. Scott Baio knows black people, y’all.

And finally, a thought for our favorite chachbag:

They’re just jokes, folks! Jokes about uppity black people. And guys in drag. And transgendered people. And messages from “true” Americans. Why can’t you laugh at these people, like Scott Baio does? Why do you hate freedom of speech?

As always, remember to follow Scott Baio on Twitter and enjoy his racist, homophobic, kah-razy tweets yourself.

→ 9 CommentsCategories: Celebrities · Chachbaggery · Social Media
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rape Isn’t Always Rape If It’s At Penn State

January 19, 2010 · 1 Comment

Okay, NPR. You are my favorite liberal-communist-fascist-propaganda machine. I like you. I think Ira Glass is cute and everything. But seriously? You’re kind of being douchebags.

See, there was this episode of This American Life. It was about attending a “party school”, with the focus on Penn State. And in the course of this episode, there was talk of a certain thing that often happens at every school: sexual acts are performed without someone’s consent. You and I call this thing “rape”.

But NPR doesn’t call this rape. They call it “unwanted sexual contact”, a WTF?!?worthy term if there ever was one. And even after they were called on the stupidity of using “unwanted sexual contact” to describe rape, they still wouldn’t concede that they were wrong. Instead, producer Sarah Koenig decided to explain the nuances of actual rape and sex that is merely “unwanted”:

To be clear, our intention was in no way to speak of rape euphemistically, or to sidestep the issue.

Except that’s exactly what you did.

Rather, we used the term “unwanted sexual experience” because it duplicates the language used by Penn State University in its own annual student surveys.

Okay? And? Penn State has decided to speak of rape euphemistically and sidestep the issue of their students being raped and raping; why does NPR feel the need to do the same?

Here’s the question students of both sexes were asked: “Have you been a victim of an unwanted sexual experience?” (Six percent of those surveyed in 2009 said yes.)

So six percent of said students were raped.

A narrower survey, of just the first two months of 2009, asked these questions: Have you: “Had sex when you didn’t really want to?” (9.4% said yes)

Raped.

Been pressured or forced to have sex with someone when you were too drunk to prevent it?” (3.4% said yes)

Also raped.

Pressured or forced someone to have sex with you after you had been drinking?” (1.5% said yes).

Committed rape.

While some of these incidents the students reported likely are rape, it’s also safe to say that some of them aren’t, and we wanted to be very careful not to misconstrue the data.

“It’s safe to say that some” occasions wherein a student was pressured or forced to have sex after drinking, who may or may not have been to drunk to either consent or not, WEREN’T RAPE?

This is the only data on sexual consequences/violence, as it relates to alcohol, that the university collects, so these were the only numbers, and terms, we felt we could use responsibly enough to broadcast.

Yes, ladies. Even NPR thinks that if you slatterns drink too much, you get what you deserve. (You were probably asking for it, anyways.)

I do know that the majority of sexual assaults at colleges do involve alcohol, and maybe we should have said that. And perhaps I should have looked nationally to see if there’s good, specific data linking drinking and rape on campuses. However, since we were mostly concentrating on stats at Penn State, we used what they had.

Penn State: where only 6% of students are raped, except for that other 12.8% that might have been raped, except they had a drink or something, so they just had sex they couldn’t or didn’t consent to, but that’s not rape-rape, okay?

→ 1 CommentCategories: America · Feminism · Media · Society
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Of Devils and Douchebags

January 14, 2010 · 1 Comment

There’s a lot to say about what Radical Cleric and All Around Terrible Person Pat Robertson said about Haiti. It was vile. It was stupid. It was just another day in vile and stupid things that Pat Robertson has made a living saying. I’m going to post his great theological statement on why Haitians deserve to be poor and die in full, because no one should forget disgusting it was:

And you know, Kristi, something happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people might not want to talk about it. They were under the heel of the French, uh, you know Napoleon the 3rd and whatever, and they got together and swore a pact to the Devil. They said, ‘We will serve you if you’ll get us free from the French.’ True story. And so the Devil said, ‘Okay, it’s a deal.’ And, uh, they kicked the French out, you know, with Haitians revolted and got themselves free. But ever since they have been cursed by, by one thing after another, desperately poor. That island of Hispaniola is one island. It’s cut down the middle. On the one side is Haiti on the other side is the Dominican Republican. The Dominican Republic is, is prosperous, healthy, full of resorts, etcetera. Haiti is in desperate poverty. Same island. They need to have and we need to pray for them a great turning to God and out of this tragedy I’m optimistic something good may come. But right now we’re helping the suffering people and the suffering is unimaginable.

Yeah, douchebag, that’s actually not a “true story”. It’s a sickening misreading of the myth of Haiti’s revolution which may or may not have actually happened that’s been used to both explain how slaves were able to throw off the yoke of a major European power and to justify exploiting Haiti ever since. Salon has a great interview with a historian from UCLA about the alleged pact and its consequences:

Part of the revolution mythology is that one of the revolution leaders sacrificed a pig in Bois Caïmin in a voodoo ceremony and made a contract with Petwo [Haitian voodoo spirits]. It may or may not be true, but to call that a pact with the devil is a gross misrepresentation of what voodoo* is. It’s about anything but the devil. He’s imposing an evangelical religious order on a much more sophisticated practice, and he’s turning it into a cheap invocation of Satanism.
This is hate speech. It’s saying these people are damned. It’s a frequent theme among some Christians that Haiti is being punished for this supposed pact with extreme poverty and humanitarian crises. Tragically, many evangelical Christians in Haiti may actually, in their own extreme confusion and suffering and desperation, believe that God is punishing them.
The reason Haiti is poor is because Europe imposed a blockade on trade after the slave revolt in 1804, and you have an extremely polarized class structure in which a few families stepped into the positions of the former colonial plantation owners. There has been a horrible cycle of plundering and autocracy within Haitian leadership.

That’s the “true story”. The Haitian ambassador to the U.S., Raymond Joseph, had an amazing response to Robertson’s story which you should watch in its entirety. How sad that Joseph’s eloquent and factual statements won’t get nearly as much airplay as Robertson’s ugly lies.
So, Pat Robertson is a vile douchebag. We knew that already. His lies brought out the other usual douchebags, and revealed a douchebag previously unknown to me. Witness Joe Scarborough:


Don’t you just love when people admit that something was indefensible, and then defend it? I’m sure, though, that Scarborough applies this “judge-them-by-their-deeds-not-on-their-words” to public figures from ends of the ideological divide equally. Like, if a well-known Democrat said something dumb, Scarborough would plead with people to judge said person by his actions and contributions to society, not on one poorly phrased comment*, right?

Oh. Okay, then.

*Something else I hate? The fact that to so many people, Vodou = worshiping the devil. I’m willing to bet that even people who are disgusted by Robertson’s lies make the automatic connection between this unfortunately misunderstood religion and diabolism. It is a religion. It is a religion that many (probably most) Haitians practice in some form, either exclusively or in addition to Christianity. It is not about demons or devils. It is no better or worse than any other religion. And it gave an amazing amount of inspiration to the Haitian Revolution. If you’re interested in the facts of Vodou in Haiti, I highly recommend the coverage at The Wild Hunt.

**Of course, I’m not conflating the two statements. After the initial outcry from decent people of every political stripe calms down, right wingers will certainly begin to argue that the backlash against Robertson points to a double standard. Because they are also vile and stupid, they will not understand that using an outdated (but still in use) term for African-Americans is different from stating as a fact that a country of black people made a pact with Satan (and, thus, deserve to suffer).

→ 1 CommentCategories: Media · Politics · Society
Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

On Being Called A Bitch

January 13, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Tape this to your mirrors, ladies.

I think people use the word ‘bitch’ because I’m a strong, assertive woman, and they don’t know what else to call me. If I wasn’t a woman, I don’t think people would call me a bitch. I think it’s a shame that when there is a woman that is strong and doesn’t mind speaking her mind there is no other word that can be used except for “bitch”. But I do own it because I have my own definition of what a bitch is. It’s brave, intelligent, talented, creative, and honest. And I am all those things, so I guess I am a bitch. Tabatha Coffey

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Feminism · Society
Tagged: ,

This Week In Chachbaggery: Q & A Edition

January 12, 2010 · 6 Comments

I hope y’all are following Scott Baio like I told you to. If you are, you didn’t miss his recent Q & A session with his fellow teabaggers fans. It was glorious, people. Glorious! Let’s follow along.



Yes, Scott Baio. That is exactly why you and your wife are both able to stay home with your daughter: because your father taught you wise investment techniques and you and your wife pinch pennies. I look forward to your forthcoming investment tips, such as “star in Joannie Loves Chachi” and “star in Charles In Charge“.



I’m not sure if “unemployed teen idol past his prime who likes to TwitPic photoshopped pictures of his president” is an option under Australia’s skilled migrant immigration scheme. Still, Australia: you have been warned.



True story: one of my good friends from college lists Fireproof as his favorite movie of all time on Facebook. I asked him if I could borrow it. He paused for a long time and then said, “You want to borrow it so that you can make fun of it, don’t you?” Yes. Yes, I do. So please, Scott Baio, make a low-budget action-packed Christian romance for me to enjoy! (And if Kirk Cameron happens to be your co-star, all the better.)



I know that they will take away your Republican Card if you don’t say Reagan was, is, and always shall be your favorite politician. But I bet that, for Scott Baio, this is true! Because, come on, Scott Baio’s best years were definitely the 80s.



If there’s anything that Scott Baio and Sarah Palin can agree on, it’s that reading is for loo-zers. And that President Obama is a fascist communist Maoist Kenyan from Indonesia. That, too.



No snark here. Make this happen, someone. No one can heal this country’s deep divisions like Bob Loblaw and his law blog.

→ 6 CommentsCategories: Chachbaggery · Social Media
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,